A discussion of alternatives for establishing empirical benchmarks for interpreting single-case effect sizes
In this paper we reflect on the numerous calls for the development of benchmarks for interpreting effect size indices, reviewing several possibilities. Such benchmarks are aimed to provide criteria so that analysts can judge whether the size of the effect o bserved is rather “small”, “medium” or “large”. The context of this discussion is single-case experimental designs, for which a great variety of procedures have been proposed, with their different [...]
The adequacy of different robust statistical tests in comparing two independent groups
In the current study, we evaluated various robust statistical methods for [...]
Measuring anxiety in visually-impaired people: A comparison between the linear and the nonliear IRT approaches
The present study has two main interests. First, some pending issues [...]
Evidence Gathered of Method Effects Associated to Negatively Worded Items
La recomendación de invertir ítems al medir constructos psicológicos mediante [...]
A measure of group dissimilarity for psychological attributes
Group functioning and performance in different contexts is related to [...]
