Evidence that numerical estimates of subjective ratios may be numerical ratings of subjective differences
The hypothesis that people can make non-learned numerical estimates of ratios of subjective magnitude is still unverified after over more than a century of research. Participants were asked to numerically estimate brightness ratios of pairs of surfaces whose luminances were combined factorially. With one luminance in a pair as the parameter, the ability to estimate ratios numerically predicts that the plotting of numerical estimates against the other luminance yields diverging [...]
Language does not modulate fake news credibility, but emotion does
The proliferation of fake news in internet requires understanding which factors [...]
Temporal preparation in patients with Neglect syndrome
The right parietal cortex has been widely associated with a spatial [...]
Normative data for 102 Spanish remote associate problems and age-related differences in performance
The Remote Associates Test (RAT) is a measure developed by [...]
Interpreting Foreign Smiles: Language Context and Type of Scale in the Assessment of Perceived Happiness and Sadness
The current study focuses on how different scales with varying [...]
